![]() ![]() If the court overturns or sharply limits the Chevron precedent, it would become easier for business owners to challenge regulations across the economy. When the Supreme Court decides on the case, most likely in its next term, the outcome could have implications that go beyond fisheries. The National Marine Fisheries Service established the rule, and a group of companies has challenged whether the agency had the authority to do so. Raimondo, is a rule that requires fishing vessels to pay for monitors who ensure that they comply with regulations meant to prevent overfishing. According to the decision, if part of the law Congress wrote empowering a regulatory agency is ambiguous but the agency’s interpretation is reasonable, judges should defer to it.Īt issue in the case, Loper Bright Enterprises v. ![]() In a terse order, the court said it would hear a case that seeks to limit or overturn a unanimous 1984 precedent, Chevron v. ![]() WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to take up a case that could make it easier to curtail the power of administrative agencies, a long-running goal of the conservative legal movement that could have far-reaching implications for how American society imposes rules on businesses. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |